 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 By Nina LARSON Geneva (AFP) Sept 16, 2020
The World Trade Organization has upheld a complaint by China over additional US duties on some $250 billion of Chinese goods, a decision that sparked outrage in Washington. The Geneva-based body has been caught in the middle of trade tensions between the United States and China, and has faced relentless attacks from President Donald Trump. The tariffs, imposed in 2018, marked the beginning of the trade war between the world's two largest economies. But a panel of experts -- set up by WTO's Dispute Settlement Body last year to review the US move -- ruled Tuesday the tariffs on Chinese goods were "inconsistent" with global trade rules, and recommended the US "bring its measures into conformity with its obligations". The decision was met with ire in the US, with Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer saying it proved the WTO "is completely inadequate to stop China's harmful technology practices". "The Trump Administration will not let China use the WTO to take advantage of American workers, businesses, farmers, and ranchers," he said. But Beijing welcome the move as an "objective and fair ruling". "China also hopes that the United States will fully respect the rulings of the expert group...take practical actions to meet China and other WTO members half way, jointly maintain the multilateral trading system, and promote the stable and healthy development of the world economy," a spokesman from the commerce ministry said. - 'Blatant breach' - Tuesday's announcement marks one of the first in a series of anticipated panel rulings over complaints filed by a long line of countries over Trump's decision to hit them with steep tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. In a 72-page report, the panel said Washington had "not met its burden of demonstrating that its measures were provisionally justified" under international trade rules. In particular, it rejected the US argument that the tariffs were applied to products it said had benefitted from practices that the US considers are contrary to "public morals", like theft, misappropriation and unfair competition. "The United States had not met its burden of demonstrating how its restrictions contributed to protecting its public morals and did not extend beyond what was necessary," it said. - 'No remedy' - Lightizer said in response the US report had cited thousands of pieces of evidence showing China's unfair trade practices, which "have cost US innovators, workers, and businesses billions of dollars every year". He said the WTO ruling showed that it "provides no remedy for such misconduct". Usually parties unhappy with a panel decision can appeal within 60 days. But that process has been complicated since the WTO Appellate Body -- also known as the supreme court of world trade -- stopped functioning in December after years of relentless US opposition. Washington accuses the court of major overreach and has blocked the appointment of new judges, leaving it without the required quorum. The European Union, China and a number of other countries have launched a temporary system for appealing trade dispute rulings, but the United States is not participating. In its report, the panel stressed that it was "very much aware of the wider context in which the WTO system currently operates, which is one reflecting a range of unprecedented global trade tensions". It called on the United States and China to "pursue further efforts to achieve a mutually satisfactory solution" to their dispute.
EU and China talk trade despite rifts Brussels (AFP) Sept 14, 2020 EU leaders will talk to Chinese President Xi Jinping seeking trade and investment Monday, despite tensions over Hong Kong's freedoms and Beijing's treatment of its Uighur minority. Chinese officials, EU chiefs Charles Michel and Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will hold a video-conference to replace a full summit with all 27 EU leaders cancelled because of coronavirus. China says an investment deal - already seven years in the making - can be agreed this year, but EU o ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
