Energy News  
US says cannot rework nuclear deal with India

by Staff Writers
New Delhi (AFP) Aug 18, 2007
A top US official has said a controversial nuclear pact with New Delhi cannot be renegotiated amid demands from Indian critics for a radical reworking of the deal.

"We cannot renegotiate it because the agreement is done. Neither government wishes it to be renegotiated because it is now complete," US under secretary of State Nicholas Burns told Outlook magazine in an interview published on the weekend.

The agreement will allow New Delhi to buy atomic fuel, technology and plants even though it is not party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, but critics say it will limit India's strategic options.

The agreement -- reached last month after nearly two years of negotiations -- has drawn heavy and widespread criticism from opposition parties and the government's communist allies.

Burns declined to comment on criticism by the communists, whose support is crucial to the survival of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's Congress-led coalition government in parliament.

"So I don't have any particular message for them except to say that in the 21st century we have seen the global balance of forces is shifting," said Burns, the chief US negotiator of the deal.

"That it is in the common interest of India and the US to be partners, certainly on the effort to bring peace and stability in South and East Asia."

The Indian government came under mounting criticism after a US State Department spokesman said this week that the accord had provisions allowing Washington to terminate the agreement if India tested atomic weapons.

Singh and Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee have said that the negotiation will not hinder the country's nuclear testing options.

The communists -- who are attending a two-day meeting in the national capital to work out their strategy in parliament on the issue -- say the agreement would also lead to US interference in India's foreign policy.

But Burns dismissed the suggestion.

"No one is trying to challenge India's sovereignty as a country to make its own decisions," Burns said.

Tensions between the government and its allies mounted last week after Singh told the Communists the deal would not be renegotiated and dared them to withdraw support for the ruling Congress coalition.

In an interview published over the weekend, Singh also hit out at the Hindu nationalist Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) over its opposition on the issue.

"They didn't even believe that I would last as the prime minister and some leaders even did havans (Hindu rituals) that I should die on a certain day," Singh told India Today weekly magazine.

"It (the agreement) requires a big leap in approach and the attitude of BJP is disappointing."

Singh also recalled that the US president had told him in 2005, "Don't expect me to help you to build bombs. I told him I didn't expect the US to do that because with our previous achievements, we didn't need anyone's help."

India staged nuclear weapon tests in 1974 and again in 1998.

On Friday, India's parliament erupted in furore after former defence minister George Fernandes accused Singh of misleading the country over terms of the deal and said if it had happened in China the premier would have received a "bullet in his head."

The deal still requires final US Congressional approval.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Indian uranium deal as good as NPT: Australia
Sydney (AFP) Aug 17, 2007
Prime Minister John Howard on Friday defended Australia's landmark deal to sell uranium to nuclear power India, saying its safeguards were as strong as the international anti-proliferation treaty.







  • Great powers cast bids for strategic Central Asia
  • Analysis: Mideast struggles to power area
  • Analysis: Oil flows in Basra power vacuum
  • Analysis: Caspian pipeline wars

  • Yemen says foreign firms to build nuclear reactor
  • Indian uranium deal as good as NPT: Australia
  • US says cannot rework nuclear deal with India
  • Australia close to deal to supply uranium to Russia: FM

  • Invisible Gases Form Most Organic Haze In Both Urban And Rural Areas
  • BAE Systems Completes Major New Facility For Ionospheric Physics Research
  • NASA Satellite Captures First View Of Night-Shining Clouds
  • Main Component For World Latest Satellite To Measure Greenhouse Gases Delivered

  • The Limited Carbon Market Puts 20 Percent Of Tropical Forest At Risk
  • Lula hails slower pace of Amazon destruction
  • Rain Forest Protection Works In Peru
  • Indian State Plants 10 Million Trees In One Day

  • Global warming boosts crop disease
  • Change On The Range
  • 'Worrisome signs' for global rice crop
  • Conventional Plowing Is Skinning Our Agricultural Fields

  • Toyota To Delay Launch Of New Hybrids
  • Driving Changes For The Car Of The Future
  • GM Sales In China To Hit One Million Vehicles
  • US Should Consider Gas Tax Says Ford Chief

  • Russia To Build Over 4,500 Aircraft By 2025
  • Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft
  • Steering Aircraft Clear Of Choppy Air
  • EAA AirVenture 2007

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space
  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement