US poised to regulate C02 in Copenhagen boost
Washington (AFP) Dec 7, 2009 The US government was set Monday to pave the way to regulate carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant, sidestepping a divided Congress to boost global climate talks in Copenhagen. A US official said on condition of anonymity that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would declare that it can impose rules to reduce carbon emissions, even if Congress does not approve legislation to do so. The EPA said that its chief, Lisa Jackson, would make a "significant climate announcement" at 1:15 pm (1815 GMT) without giving further details. The National Wildlife Federation, a conservation group that supports action to curb global warming, hailed the expected move as providing impetus to closely watched talks in Copenhagen as they kicked off Monday. "We are enthusiastic and fully supportive of this," said Tony Iallonardo, a spokesman for the group. "It's the right move at the right time." President Barack Obama has been hoping to show that the United States, which shuns the current Kyoto Protocol, is committed to action under a new deal on global warming being hammered out in Copenhagen. Such a ruling could let the EPA order better insulation or greener technology to reduce emissions across the United States, the world's largest economy and second biggest source of carbon blamed for global warming. But the move has already faced fierce resistance by business leaders and Republicans in the US Congress, which has yet to finalize unrelated legislation that would use a trading system to force emission cuts. The US Chamber of Commerce, the nation's top business lobby, feared that businesses would be subject to a host of new regulations at a time of economic uncertainty. Thomas Donohue, the chamber's president, said in a statement that an EPA ruling could "choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every major construction and renovation project." Republican lawmakers have seized on leaked emails from climate scientists that they say calls into question the basis behind action on global warming. In a letter to Jackson, four Republicans critical of global warming legislation said that the scandal should lead the EPA to reassess its position. "The EPA's climate change regulations are based on compromised scientific reports and heavily flawed data," said Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming. "The EPA must now withdraw all proposed climate change rules and regulations and conduct their own research," he said. Climate scientists say that the hacked emails were taken out of context and that overwhelming evidence convinces them that human activity is causing a dangerous rising of temperatures. An EPA ruling would be separate from legislation in Congress to create the first US nationwide "cap-and-trade" system -- which would restrict business' emissions but offer an economic incentive by allowing trading in credits. The Senate is looking at a proposal to force emission cuts of 20 percent by 2020 off 2005 levels, slightly more ambitious than a 17 percent reduction in legislation that squeaked through the House of Representatives in June. Obama's allies hope to finalize the legislation early next year despite opposition by many Republicans. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links
British firm gets taste for 'poo power' London (AFP) Dec 7, 2009 Britain's biggest water company lifted the lid Monday on how it slashed costs by burning customers' faeces to make electricity. Thames Water said "poo power" saved them 15 million pounds (24.6 million dollars, 16.6 million euros) last year by generating renewable energy from the foulest of sources. The company, which handles the waste of 13.6 million people in London and the River Thames ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |