Energy News  
US Nuclear Plants Vulnerable To Big Attack: Report

Since the September 11, 2001, attacks, the government has spent one billion dollars to boost nuclear power plant security, compared to 20 billion for aviation security, Time reported.

Washington (AFP) Jun 12, 2005
The US government may have set its security standards for nuclear power plants too low, and guards say they may not be ready to stop a terrorist attack of September 11 magnitude, a US magazine reported Sunday.

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) document "raises serious questions about whether the government has set security requirements for nuclear plants too low and allowed nuclear plant operators to provide security on the cheap," Time reported.

Even plant guards worry they would be unable to thwart a big terrorist operation, saying they lack the necessary training and weapons, the magazine said. The plants could also be vulnerable to an attack on foot, it said.

"Our training has increased, but I don't think it's increased enough to deal with that," a veteran guard, who was not named, told Time. Another guard said: "We don't have the weapons or training to stop an attack of that magnitude. ... Everyone feels that way. It's a consensus of opinion."

"I don't think they could handle a 9/11-size attack," David Orrik, a senior NRC official who retired in February after a 20-year career probing power-plant vulnerabilities, was quoted as saying.

Since the September 11, 2001, attacks, the government has spent one billion dollars to boost nuclear power plant security, compared to 20 billion for aviation security, Time reported.

"The NRC and the nuclear power industry are today where the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] and airlines were on Sept. 10, 2001," a senior US anti-terrorism official was quoted as saying by the magazine.

NRC-commissioned studies say a plant's concrete and steel infrastructure could withstand a suicide airplane attack, making the risks of a major release of radioactivity low.

But other experts, including a recent National Academy of Sciences panel, say the particular design and vulnerabilities of each plant make such blanket assurances meaningless, Time said.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


India Calls For Action Against Nuclear Proliferators
New Delhi (AFP) Oct 24, 2005
India Monday urged the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to take action against illegal proliferators of nuclear weapons technology such as Pakistan's disgraced scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan.







  • Timor Sea Exploration Breakthrough
  • Beacon Power Delivers Flywheel-Based Power System To Bechtel Bettis
  • Vietnam Wants Mass Relocation Of People Speeded Up For Giant Power Project
  • Pollution-Eating Bacteria Produce Electricity

  • US Nuclear Plants Vulnerable To Big Attack: Report
  • Japan Planning To Ship Radioactive Soil To US: Reports
  • Nuclear Power On The Menu As France And Italy Sign Energy Deal
  • Outside View: Who Needs The NPT?

  • Scientists Seek Sprite Light Source



  • East African Farming Genetically Transformed
  • NASA Uses Remotely Piloted Airplane To Monitor Grapes

  • Eco-Friendly Motor Rally Sets Off From Kyoto To Celebrate Environment

  • BAE Systems-Raytheon To Provide NextGen Mission Planning Capabilities For U-2
  • Boeing Projects $2.1 Trillion Market For New Commercial Airplanes
  • Pentagon Report Slams Boeing Aircraft Lease Deal
  • Tanker Scandal: Blame But No Punishment

  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program
  • Boeing-Led Team to Study Nuclear-Powered Space Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement