Energy News  
Secret British Report Calls For Nuclear Power Phaseout

the most difficult method known to man to boil water to make steam to drive turbines to make electricity to boil water to make a cup of tea

London - Dec 13, 2001
Nuclear power may have had its day. The best way to cut carbon pollution and tackle global warming is to replace oil and coal-fired power stations with renewable energy sources, says a draft British government review leaked to New Scientist. Nuclear power is simply too dangerous and expensive.

The review attempts to lay out Britain's energy strategy for the next 50 years. If the government accepts its recommendations, Britain will become one of the most environmentally friendly energy producers in the world.

The long-awaited study had been widely expected to embrace the nuclear industry's plans for up to 15 new nuclear stations. Instead, it relegates nuclear power to an also-ran that could be totally phased out by 2050 if renewable sources deliver as expected.

This happens under both main scenarios put forward in the study. One, labelled "global sustainability", assumes government intervention by regulation and financial incentives, leading to a 30 per cent contribution from renewables and a 60 per cent cut in carbon emissions. The alternative "world markets" scenario envisages a big rise in oil and gas consumption driven by consumer demand, resulting in a 20 per cent increase in carbon pollution.

Public fears about nuclear safety seem to have influenced the review, which was undertaken by the Cabinet's Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU). The technology has "an uncertain role", the report says, "since concerns about radioactive waste, accidents, terrorism and proliferation may limit or preclude its use". It also wants the cost of insuring against accidents and disposing of radioactive waste to be borne by nuclear stations rather than the government.

This makes nuclear power very expensive. It is estimated that it will cost 3.0 to 4.5 pence per kilowatt-hour by 2020, compared with 1.5 to 2.4 p/kWh for onshore wind power. Combined heat and power comes in at 1.6 to 2.4 p/kWh and gas-fired generation at 1.8 to 2.1 p/kWh. "Nowhere in the world have new nuclear stations yet been financed within a liberalised electricity market," the report points out.

The report is enthusiastic about the potential of renewable energy, which it says is the most flexible way to reduce carbon emissions. It suggests producing at least 20 per cent of electricity from renewable sources by 2020, compared with the current target of 10 per cent by 2010. That could be achieved by massively expanding the number of wind turbines on land and offshore, and by introducing wave power and underwater tidal generators.

This is backed by another government study published this week, suggesting that Scotland on its own could produce 60 gigawatts of renewable power, three-quarters of Britain's installed generating capacity.

It also urges the government to encourage the development of combined heat and power, which uses the heat from electricity generation rather than wasting it, and to set a target for a 20 per cent improvement in domestic energy efficiency by 2010.

The report will be a bitter disappointment to the nuclear industry, which had been expecting it to kick-start a nuclear renaissance. But it does urge the government to contribute to international efforts to design cheaper, safer reactors, and to ensure that Britain's nuclear regulators are "adequately staffed" to assess them.

Nick Goodall, chief executive of the British Wind Energy Association says he is delighted by the report. But Malcolm Grimston, a senior research fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, who used to work in the nuclear industry, warns that it might be too optimistic about the prospects for renewables-just as the nuclear industry was about its technology 30 years ago.

  • This article will appear in the Dec 15 issue of New Scientist

    Community
    Email This Article
    Comment On This Article

    Related Links
    SpaceDaily
    Search SpaceDaily
    Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
    Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News
    Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



    Memory Foam Mattress Review
    Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
    XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


    India Calls For Action Against Nuclear Proliferators
    New Delhi (AFP) Oct 24, 2005
    India Monday urged the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to take action against illegal proliferators of nuclear weapons technology such as Pakistan's disgraced scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan.







  • More Reliable Power Sought

  • Secret British Report Calls For Nuclear Power Phaseout
  • Britain Joins Armenia And Bulgaria On Nuclear Watch List
  • Ireland Steps Up Campaign Against British Nuclear Plant
  • Civilian Nuclear Industries Under Siege Of New Concerns









  • Boeing Sonic Cruiser Completes First Wind Tunnel Tests



  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement