Energy News  
Nuclear power gains steam in energy race

Areva looks to build six nuclear plants in Britain
Areva, the world's largest nuclear power group, on Thursday welcomed Britain's decision to build a new generation of such plants and said it wanted to build up to six of them. Areva said in a statement it was "delighted with the decision, which will boost investment in (Britain's) nuclear power generation." "It is our ambition to build at least four, and possibly six nuclear power plants in Britain," said Luc Oursel, head of Areva's nuclear reactor division. In June last year, Areva submitted details of its third generation nuclear power plant to the British authorities for review. Only last month, Areva chief executive Anne Lauvergeon said the company wanted to account for a third of all new nuclear reactors built worldwide between now and 2030, "Between now and 2030 we believe there could be 100 to 300 (nuclear reactors built around the world)," she said. "We want a third of that business." The British government on Thursday approved a new generation of nuclear power stations, describing evidence in support of the move as "compelling" while environmental groups attacked the decision as unwise and unnecessary.
by Staff Writers
Paris (AFP) Jan 10, 2008
Nuclear power, despite controversy over safety, pollution and cost factors, is rapidly gathering steam in a race to guarantee energy as emerging economies compete for fuel and particularly oil.

A decision by Britain on Thursday to build new nuclear power generation plants is the latest example of this trend for countries to renew or to begin building nuclear capacity.

Today there are 442 nuclear power reactors at work in 201 power stations in 31 countries. Of these, 104 are in the United States, 58 in France and 55 in Japan, together accounting for about half of the total.

A plant is under construction in Finland by the world-leading French nuclear power group Areva, headed by Anne Lauvergeon who says that 100-300 reactors will be built around the world by 2030. She wants Areva to build one third of these.

The United States expects to build new nuclear power stations for the first time for nearly 30 years since a dramatic accident at the Three Mile Island plant in March 1979.

Several countries in the Mediterranean basin such as Egypt, Morocco, Algeria and Libya have said in recent months that they intend to build nuclear power plants for the first time.

China, experiencing a huge increase in demand for energy, recently ordered two so-called third-generation European pressurized reactors (EPRs) from France.

India also wants to develop nuclear power but must first sign an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ensuring that any such facilities would not be used to provide material for nuclear weapons.

France has offered to cooperate with several of these countries. However western countries continue to express concern about whether the the nuclear power programme in Iran is purely for civil use or also has a covert military purpose.

There are still deeply different views about nuclear energy within Europe. Italy abandoned the generation of nuclear power in 1987 and Germany has decided to end all of its nuclear generation by 2020.

But the surge of oil prices to around 100 dollars a barrel, and commitments to combat the effect of carbon on global warming, have re-opened debate on the benefits of nuclear power in these countries.

The International Energy Agency, a Paris based offshoot of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, has warned that if Germany, Sweden and Belgium pursue policies to end nuclear power generation, the amount of energy provided from nuclear material could fall to 11.0 percent in 2030 from 15.0 percent now.

Coal is the main fuel used throughout the world for the generation of electricity, accounting for 40 percent, followed by gas (20 percent), hydro power (16 percent), nuclear energy (15 percent), oil (seven percent), and other renewable energies (two percent).

Nuclear power produces little carbon dioxide and is competitive even with coal if this is taken into account, some experts say.

But nuclear power stations create radioactive waste which is difficult to store with safety. In addition, the construction of a nuclear power station takes 10 years, compared with four years to build a coal-fired plant and two and a half years for a gas-powered station.

The potential market is attracting interest from many companies. The leading builders of nuclear power plants are Areva of France, Westinghouse of the United States and Atomstroyexport of Russia, together with leading groups in the field of electricity generation in general, the makers of turbines and big construction groups.

The prospect of the construction of a nuclear power station is always met by opposition by ecologists and by people living near the planned site.

The head of French electricity generator and distributor EDF, Pierre Gadonneix, says that the biggest challenge for those who support nuclear energy is to make it acceptable to public opinion.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Britain approves new nuclear reactors, to Green fury
London (AFP) Jan 10, 2008
The British government approved Thursday a new generation of nuclear power stations, describing the move as "compelling" but infuriating environmentalists who are considering a legal challenge.







  • Ireland to ban low-efficiency light bulbs
  • Analysis: Turkey, Iran shiver together
  • Energy Insights Predicts Climate Change Issues To Drive Increased Tech Investment In 2008
  • Analysis: Russia eyes Nigerian gas

  • Egypt names site of first nuclear power reactor
  • Britain approves new nuclear reactors, to Green fury
  • Nuclear power gains steam in energy race
  • Groups lobby for restrictions on US-India nuclear deal

  • New Model Revises Estimates Of Terrestrial Carbon Dioxide Uptake
  • A Breathable Earth
  • Researchers Find Origin Of Breathable Atmosphere Half A Billion Years Ago
  • Study Reveals Lakes A Major Source Of Prehistoric Methane

  • PM pledges one billion dollars for struggling mining, forestry towns
  • No Convincing Evidence For Decline In Tropical Forests
  • Carbon Sink Capacity In Northern Forests Reduced By Global Warming
  • Indonesia: President urges better forest management amid floods

  • Overgrazing Accelerating Soil Erosion In Northern Mexico
  • Australia looks to GM crops after scorching 2007
  • Fisheries Should Be Regarded As A Part Of The Maritime Environment
  • China's Agricultural Bank ready for bailout: officials

  • India's low-cost car may prove too high a price to pay
  • Launch Of Fisker Premium Hybrid At North American International Auto Show
  • GM says China ventures notch sales record
  • Automobile's future is electronic and green: GM chief

  • Purdue Wind Tunnel Key For Hypersonic Vehicles And Future Space Planes
  • Antarctic ballooning hits milestone
  • Chinese major aircraft makers to build big planes: report
  • Dutch cops to ditch helicopters for airships in green bid: agency

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement