Energy News  
FirstEnergy To Transition To Dry Storage Of Coal Ash

The toxins in coal ash have been linked to cancer, organ failure, and other serious health problems. Ash is often stored in enormous quantities in landfills, impoundment ponds or abandoned mines, many of which lack adequate linings that prevent leaching of these components into groundwater.
by Staff Writers
Akron OH (SPX) Feb 02, 2010
FirstEnergy is planning to stop pumping coal ash into the 1,000-acre pond at its Bruce Mansfield Plant in Shippingport, PA and transition to a dry method of waste storage, according to investors withdrawing a shareholder proposal on coal ash from the company.

"We commend FirstEnergy for taking action to mitigate the risks associated with wet storage of coal ash by transitioning to dry storage for all of its facilities," says Emily Stone of Green Century Capital Management (Green Century), lead shareholder on the proposal.

"We will continue to pressure the company to fully dewater the Little Blue Run pond as it finalizes its closure plan." Other shareholders that filed the resolution include Trillium Asset Management Corporation, the Camilla Madden Charitable Trust, and Catholic Healthcare Partners.

Coal ash is a by-product of burning coal that contains arsenic, mercury, heavy metals and other toxins filtered out of smokestacks by pollution control equipment.

The toxins in coal ash have been linked to cancer, organ failure, and other serious health problems. Ash is often stored in enormous quantities in landfills, impoundment ponds or abandoned mines, many of which lack adequate linings that prevent leaching of these components into groundwater.

The Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA's) 1.1 billion gallon coal ash spill in December 2008 that covered over 300 acres in eastern Tennessee with toxic sludge highlights the serious environmental and financial risks associated with coal ash. TVA has estimated a total cleanup cost of up to $1.2 billion, not including the extensive legal claims that have arisen in the spill's aftermath.

According to Green Century, FirstEnergy was not the only company to receive inquiries or shareholder proposals about coal ash. Investors in major coal utilities, including Southern Company and CMS Energy, have been urging the companies to mitigate risks associated with the storage of coal ash.

"Recent events, including the disastrous Tennessee Valley Authority spill, reports of health problems in communities that store ash, and the U.S. EPA's decision to reassess the hazardous nature of coal waste, highlight the potential financial liabilities associated with storing coal combustion waste," says Dan Bakal of Ceres, a coalition of investors and environmental groups that is participating in the effort.

Beyond the risks associated with coal ash spills, shareholders argue there are additional financial risks related to the contamination of local water supplies, and concerns have been raised about public health and environmental hazards from the re-use of dry ash for purposes like agriculture and landscaping.

The EPA has found evidence at over 60 sites in the U.S. that coal ash has polluted ground and surface waters. While public health concerns have been raised about both wet and dry storage, storing dry coal ash in securely lined and capped landfills is a "best practice" for risk mitigation as it minimizes the possibility of contamination or spills.

Investors will continue to engage with companies to encourage the implementation of this "best practice" and to give serious consideration to dewatering any existing wet impoundments

"Shareholders are concerned about the lack of disclosure on this issue - we don't see much evidence that companies are actively managing ash-related risks," notes Amy Galland of As You Sow, a group that filed shareholder proposals on coal ash at MDU Resources and CMS Energy.

"FirstEnergy's decision to discontinue wet ash storage at its only remaining non-dry storage site and to implement a long-term strategy of using only dry storage sets an example for the industry. We urge all utilities to increase disclosure and take steps to mitigate risks associated with coal ash, such as implementing secure dry storage and safe reuse."



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Green Century Capital Management
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Vattenfall has high hopes for wave power
Stockholm, Sweden (UPI) Feb 1, 2009
Swedish energy giant Vattenfall says ocean energy - such as wave power, salinity power or power from sea currents - will become commercially viable as early as 2020. The Swedes place their hopes in wave power, which they estimate could account for up 10 percent of Vattenfall's power generation in 2030. The potential of wave power is huge. Vattenfall says it can ultimately produ ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement