. | . |
|
. |
by Staff Writers Ottawa (AFP) Nov 29, 2011 Environmental groups attacked a proposed pipeline from Canada's oil sands to the Pacific coast on Tuesday, saying it would attract tanker shipping and risk oil spills along a pristine coastline. A report by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Pembina Institute and the Living Oceans Society said the project posed risks to communities, salmon-bearing rivers, and coastal ecosystems, including the habitat of a rare white bear. "The Northern Gateway pipeline is not worth the risk for the communities, rivers and Pacific coastline of British Columbia," said Nathan Lemphers, a policy analyst with the Pembina Institute. The pipeline, proposed by Canadian company Enbridge, would transport oil from Alberta's tar sands through nearly 1,200 kilometers (750 miles) of rugged mountain landscapes to Kitimat on British Columbia's northern coast, for eventual shipping to Asia. Up to 220 supertankers each year would sip from it, the report estimated. "History has shown that oil tankers come with oil spills. It is not a question of if, but when, a spill will happen," said Katie Terhune of the Living Oceans Society.
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
|
. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2011 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement |