Defects Found In Reactor At Controversial Bulgarian Nuclear Plant
Sofia (AFP) Apr 25, 2006 Part of the protection system of a relatively new reactor at the controversial Kozloduy nuclear power plant in Bulgaria was found to be defective when a minor accident occurred in March, Kozloduy director Ivan Ivanov said Tuesday. The Bulgarian government has reached a deal with the European Union to mothball four of the six reactors at Kozloduy, which supplies 42 percent of the country's energy. The closure of the four oldest Soviet-design reactors, for safety reasons, was a precondition set by Brussels for starting EU membership talks with Sofia. The defect discovered in March was detected in one of the two remaining reactors. The EU has not expressed security concerns about these. Ivanov said the defect had come to light during a failure on March 1 of the electricity circuit support system of the main coolant pump of reactor five. That prompted authorities to shut the reactor down pending repairs and security checks, he said. During preparation for switch-off the operator saw that "22 out of the 62 control rods did not work" but "there was no danger whatsoever of an explosion", Ivanov said. "We noticed the defect and proceeded towards switching off the reactor. The protection system still had the necessary capacity," he added. Ivanov said the accident had been minor, ranking at level one or "anomaly" on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), which has seven levels ranging from zero (no safety significance) to seven (major accident). His statement on bTV private television came in reaction to a comment made by another Bulgarian nuclear expert, Georgy Kaschiev, who called the number five reactor "a train without an emergency break". Kaschiev said "there was a massive failure of the protection elements, unprecedented in the whole history of nuclear energy (use)" that corresponded to a "level two or three incident" on the INES scale. Kaschiev, who now works at the Institute of Risk Research at the University of Vienna was sacked in 2001 as head of the Bulgarian nuclear regulatory authority after criticizing "a disturbing tendency for degradation of security" at the plant. Economy and Energy Minister Rumen Ovcharovalso reacted Tuesday to Kaschiev's statement, qualifying it as "speculations by people who, in the past years, have done everything possible to compromise Bulgaria's energy sector and the country". Sergey Tsachev, the current director of the nuclear regulatory authority, told national radio Sunday that "the speculations around Kozloduy are riding on public interest around the anniversary of the accident at Chernobyl" on April 26. In 2002 the Bulgarian government mothballed the two oldest 440-megawatt reactors at Kozloduy and agreed to shut two more of the plant's six reactors by end-2006, as a condition for joining the EU in 2007. The EU has not questioned the safety of the two newest 1,000-megawatt reactors, number five and number six. The protection system for reactor five has not needed to be activated over the past five years, while the protection system for reactor six has not been called into action for nine years now, Ivanov said.
Source: Agence France-Presse Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links - Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
The Real Toll Of Chernobyl Remains Hidden In Background Noise Yorktown Heights NJ (UPI) Apr 21, 2006 The headline of The New York Times Sept. 8, 2005 editorial, "Chernobyl's Reduced Impact," indicated that the consequences of Chernobyl are now understood to be substantially less serious than previously estimated. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |