Big Oil, Bigger Giveaways
Washington DC (SPX) Aug 07, 2008 Federal dollars continue to flow toward oil companies that are earning record profits and fueling our oil addiction. This analysis of the tax code and federal budget reveals that oil companies are slated to receive more than $32.9 billion in handouts from taxpayers over the next five years. This figure includes tax benefits, royalty relief, research and development subsidies and accounting gimmicks that benefit the oil industry. The figure could dramatically increase over the next 25 years if current tax breaks are extended and if oil companies win a lawsuit seeking to avoid paying up to $53 billion in royalty revenue for offshore drilling. Congress should act immediately to end these giveaways to the oil and gas industry.
Oil Company Earnings Skyrocket after 2005 Energy Bill
Federal Handouts Lavish Billions on Oil and Gas Companies Between tax incentives, royalty relief, research and development subsidies and accounting gimmicks, these companies will receive more than $32.9 billion from the federal government over the next five years. The companies are receiving additional subsidies from federally funded international institutions.
Oil and Gas Tax Breaks + Oil and gas percentage depletion allowance Created in 1916, this incentive allows independent oil companies to deduct 15 percent of their sales revenue to reflect the declining value of their investment. This flat deduction bears little resemblance to the actual loss in value over time and companies often end up deducting more than the value of their initial investment. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 modified the percentage depletion, expanding the credit by allowing refiners whose average daily production remains less than 75,000 barrels, instead of 50,000 barrels, to claim it. This tax break will cost $5.9 billion over five years. + Manufacturing tax deduction for oil and gas companies In 2004, Congress passed H.R. 4520, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The intent of the bill was to bring U.S. export subsidies into compliance with global trade laws. During the legislative process, provisions were added to the bill that classified oil and natural gas production as a manufactured good. The change allowed oil and gas companies to claim billions of dollars of new tax deductions, effectively lowering their tax rate. Initial estimates provided to Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) by the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that reclassification would cost the federal government approximately $3.5 billion over the next 5 years under this deduction.4 However, efforts to change this tax benefit, most recently as a part of the H.R. 5351 "The Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008," indicate that denying oil and gas companies this deduction could raise more than $5.1 billion in revenue. + Intangible drilling costs Integrated oil companies such as ExxonMobil are allowed to immediately deduct 70 percent of "intangible drilling costs" such as the cost of wages, supplies, and site preparation, rather than capitalizing them. Smaller, independent oil and gas producers are allowed to immediately deduct all of their intangible drilling costs. This tax break will cost $3.5 billion over five years. + Deductions for foreign tax The tax code provides a loophole that allows oil and gas companies to under report their taxable foreign income. Foreign countries are converting traditional royalty payments into income tax payments. The U.S. tax code allows approximately 35 percent of a royalty payment to be deducted as a standard business expense. Foreign income tax payments can be deducted at 100 percent. Congress has considered several efforts to modify this deduction over the past 2 years. According to estimates from the Joint Committee on Taxation, modifying the deduction would have raised $3 billion over the next five years. + Expensing for refining equipment This tax break was created in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and allows companies to deduct 50 percent of the cost of certain equipment used at oil refineries to refine liquid fuels. This tax break will cost $2.1 billion over five years. + Enhanced Oil Recovery This tax break provides oil and gas companies with a 15 percent income tax credit to increase the production oil and gas production from older wells. to qualify for the credit, companies can force water, steam, carbon dioxide or other chemicals into the reservoir to force the harder to obtain oil and gas out of the well. This tax break will cost almost $1.7 billion over five years. + Geological and geophysical expenditures This tax break was created in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and allows companies to deduct the costs associated with searching for oil, amortizing the costs over a two-year period. Companies would still be eligible for this deduction even if they discover oil and gas. The credit, which the Joint Committee on Taxation scored at $800 million over five years, was modified in H.R. 4297, the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005. The modification increased the time that integrated oil companies could deduct geological and geophysical expenditures from 2 years to 5 years.7 Given the changes, the tax break is now expected to cost $1.1 billion over the next five years. + Natural gas distribution lines This tax break was created in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and accelerates the rate at which companies can deduct the cost of natural gas distribution pipelines, reducing the depreciation time from 20 years to 15 years. This tax break will cost $522 million over five years. + Passive Loss This tax break allows owners and investors in oil and gas properties to use loses from the oil and gas business to shelter other income. This tax break will cost $130 million over five years. + Small Refiners Deduction Originally created in H.R. 4520, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and later modified by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, this tax break allows small refiners to deduct 75 percent of their capital costs to comply with new Environmental Protection Agency sulfur rules, and als- provides a $2.10 credit per barrel of low sulfur diesel fuel produced. The deduction was expanded in the energy bill to allow the tax benefits to be passed through to members of a cooperative. This tax break will cost $100 million over five years. + Exemption from bond arbitrage rules The provision was created in Energy Policy Act of 2005 and exempts prepayments for natural gas from tax-exempt bond arbitrage rules. This tax break will cost $18 million over five years. + Natural gas gathering lines This tax break was created in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and accelerates the rate at which companies can deduct the cost of natural gas gathering lines, establishing a 7-year depreciation recovery period. This tax break will cost $10 million over five years.11
Royalty Holidays + Royalty Relief: 1995 Deep Water Royalty Relief Act Between 1996 and 2000, the Interior Department awarded offshore drilling leases to companies drilling for oil and natural gas in the Gulf of Mexico. Leases awarded in 1998 and 1999 failed to include "price thresholds," a critical safety valve that ensures royalty relief will end when prices rise above a certain amount. The failure to include the price thresholds already costs taxpayers $1 billion in foregone royalty revenue. Using Minerals Management Service data, Friends of the Earth calculated that over the next five years oil and gas companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexic- will receive approximately $3.8 billion in royalty relief. This number is likely to dramatically increase as a result of the successful lawsuit filed by the company Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas, now owned by Anadark- Petroleum Company, challenging the legality of price thresholds in deep-water leases issued between 1996 and 2000. A June 2008 letter from the Government Accountability Office14 estimated that as a result of the successful lawsuit the federal government could lose as much as $53 billion over the next 25 years if the lawsuit victory is upheld. + Royalty Relief: Energy Policy Act of 2005 Despite massive losses to taxpayers expected as a result of royalty relief included in past offshore drilling leases, Congress enacted additional royalty relief provisions in the 2005 Energy Bill. The following provisions will allow oil and gas companies to negotiate new leases with the federal government that allow them to drill without paying royalties. An estimate of the future benefits the oil industry will gain as a result of these provisions does not currently exist, but in order to prevent future taxpayer losses Congress should repeal the provisions: - Royalty-in-Kind Payments Section 342 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 codifies the royalty-in-kind payment scheme sought by oil and gas producers in which the federal government is paid in oil and gas instead of cash. - Relief for marginal producers Section 343 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 provides royalty relief for "marginal property" oil and gas production that produces less than 15 barrels a day when prices fall below $15 a barrel. - Relief for deep wells in shallow waters of the Outer Continental Shelf Section 344 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 provides royalty relief for natural gas production from deep wells (greater than 15,000 feet) in shallow waters (less than 400 meters) of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The provision grants royalty relief for leases of n- less than 35 billion cubic feet, subject to price thresholds. - Relief for deep water wells in the Gulf of Mexico Section 345 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 continues the federal government's commitment to provide oil and gas companies royalty relief when they drill in waters in the Gulf of Mexic- deeper than 400 meters. - Relief for offshore production in Alaska Section 346 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 expands the Outer Continental Lands Act to encompass offshore oil and gas development in Alaska. The expansion will allow Alaska drillers to receive royalty relief for oil and gas production. - Relief for methane gas hydrates in the Outer Continental Shelf and Alaska Section 353 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 provides royalty relief to oil and gas companies seeking energy from methane gas hydrates. Methane gas hydrates are essentially methane trapped in ice, and can be found in the outer continental shelf and in cold regions such as Alaska. The provision provides royalty relief for up to 30 billion cubic feet of natural gas per lease, and is offered in addition to current royalty relief on leases not receiving specific methane gas hydrate relief. - Relief for enhanced oil and natural gas production Section 354 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 offers royalty relief to oil and gas companies operating wells on shore and at the outer continental shelf that inject carbon dioxide into older, less productive wells. The provision provides royalty relief for up to 5 million barrels of oil per lease. The royalty relief in this provision is in addition to the enhanced oil recovery tax credit, which provides companies with a 15 percent credit for the cost of enhanced oil recovery.
International Oil and Gas Subsidies In addition, The World Bank Group, in which the US government is the largest shareholder, has provided roughly more than $8 billion in project support and other subsidies for the oil industry since 2000. Disturbingly, the World Bank's private sector arm, the International Financial Corporation (IFC), increased its lending for fossil fuel projects by a staggering 165 percent in FY2008. Taken as a whole, the World Bank Group increased its fossil fuel lending by 60 percent in the same period.
Oil and Gas Research and Development Subsidies + Oil Technology Research and Development Program The oil and gas industry received an estimated $25 million in fiscal year 2008 through the U.S. Department of Energy's Oil Technology Research and Development Program. The program focuses on the exploration and production of crude oil in the United States with goals including the promotion and enhancement of oil drilling in the Alaskan Arctic and the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. ExxonMobil alone spent $600 million in research and development in 2004.18 Section 965 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 contains additional authorizations for the program. Over the next five years, this provision would cost $100 million. + Ultra-deepwater drilling research and development subsidy This provision was added to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 conference report after the conference committee was gaveled closed. It creates a $1.5 billion oil research and development program for ultra-deepwater drilling, benefiting an oil consortium in former- Representative Tom DeLay's home district of Sugarland, TX.
Accounting Gimmicks Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Friends of the Earth Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
Analysis: Bolivia, Venezuela bolster gas Miami (UPI) Aug 6, 2008 Venezuela has committed nearly $1 billion to help Bolivia increase its natural gas reserves -- the second-largest in Latin America -- an expenditure that comes amid increased tensions ahead of a recall referendum for the Bolivian president. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |