Why GNEP Can Not Jump To The Future

ENERGY TECH

A new study concludes that the Energy Department "lacks a credible plan for management and disposal of radioactive wastes stemming from the GNEP program, particularly regarding waste volumes, site specific impacts, regulatory requirements and life-cycle costs."

by Staff Writers
Washington DC (SPX) Apr 24, 2007
Congress is now considering whether to approve or zero out the $405 million that President Bush is proposing to spend in fiscal year 2008 on the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP)-a program aimed at rendering plutonium inert in nuclear weapons but still useful in nuclear power plants.

Nuclear experts at the National Academy of Sciences have long questioned the practicability of the technologies GNEP plans to employ. Currently, the Government Accounting Office is now reviewing the program.

This, however, leaves legislators with an information gap as they struggle to decide whether to fully fund the plan, eliminate it altogether, or redirect some of its funding to the many successful energy programs whose budgets President Bush is proposing to gut in FY 2008. In particular, major questions have been raised about the magnitude and costs of radioactive wastes stemming from the GNEP program.

To help legislators and the American public bridge this information gap, the Institute for Policy Studies will release a rigorous study of GNEP on April 23rd. Directed by Robert Alvarez, Senior Policy Advisor to the U.S. Secretary of Energy from 1993 to 1999, the report concludes that the program is likely to squander billions in taxpayer dollars on an unproven reprocessing technology that will generate unprecedented and unmanageable amounts of highly radioactive wastes without plausible disposition paths.

The potentially deadly flaws documented in Alvarez's study include:

+ The amount of long-lived radioactivity disposed of into the environment at a reprocessing site could be thousands of times greater than from nuclear weapons production. Much smaller concentrations of similar wastes at the DOE's Savannah River Site have been characterized by the National Academy of Sciences as representing "a long term safety concern."

+ GNEP would allow large quantities of cesium 135-a radionuclide with a half life of 2.3 million years-to be disposed in the near surface and pose serious contamination problems for many thousands of years.

+ More than four thousand shipments of spent nuclear reactor fuel will be transported on rails and highways through cities and farmlands to the reprocessing site, posing unprecedented emergency response and security challenges.

+ Despite DOE's claims that recycling of reactor spent fuel will solve the nuclear waste disposal problem, a small fraction is likely to be recycled. Uranium constitutes more than 95 percent of the materials in spent nuclear fuel by weight. But, it will require costly treatment for reuse in reactors - estimated in the billions of dollars. As a result, DOE's plans include the landfill disposal of tens of thousands of tons of recovered uranium.

Alvarez's study concludes that the Energy Department "lacks a credible plan for management and disposal of radioactive wastes stemming from the GNEP program, particularly regarding waste volumes, site specific impacts, regulatory requirements and life-cycle costs."

Or as Alvarez has put it more bluntly in conversation, "You can't just park some of the most highly radioactive wastes in the world at a landfill and assume that by so doing you have kept them safely removed from humans for the next 2.3 million years."

Email This Article

ENERGY TECH

Buried Residual Oil Is Still Affecting Wildlife Decades After A Spill

Bell House MS (SPX) Apr 24, 2007
Nearly four decades after a fuel oil spill polluted the beaches of Cape Cod, researchers have found the first compelling evidence for lingering, chronic biological effects on a marsh that otherwise appears to have recovered.

ENERGY TECH Buried Residual Oil Is Still Affecting Wildlife Decades After A Spill Biodiesel Will Not Drive Down Global Warming Why GNEP Can Not Jump To The Future Japan And US Eye Emission-Free Coal Plant	CIVIL NUCLEAR Nuclear Power Not The Solution For China Says Official Fault At Controversial Czech Nuclear Plant EON To Buy Land In Finland For New Nuclear Plant Russian Built Reactor Block 1 Powers Up In China
BLUE SKY NASA Aims To Clear Up Mystery Of Elusive Clouds At Edge Of Space University Of Colorado Instruments To Launch On NASA Cloud Mission Powerful New Tool To Track Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide By Source Sun-Warmed Air Pollution Flows East From Asia	WOOD PILE Museveni Defends Plans To Transfer Ugandan Forests To Indian Group Greater Use Of Biofuels Threatens Rain Forests Soybean Planting Hastens Drying Of Amazonia China Demand Driving Endangered Tree To Extinction
FARM NEWS Gates Grant To Help Poor Countries Contribute To Doomsday Seed Vault Winter Flounder On The Fast Track To Recovery Satellite Images Aid Implementation Of Agricultural Reforms Farmland Across China At Risk From Pollution	CAR TECH Driverless Car Goes On Show In London Made In USA Losing Cachet Technique Creates Metal Memory And Could Lead To Vanishing Dents Toyota Anticipates Sharp Increase In Its Hybrid Sales
AEROSPACE Australia Fears Jet Flight Guilt Could Hit Tourism Nondestructive Testing Keeps Bagram Aircraft Flying New FAA Oceanic Air Traffic System Designed By Lockheed Martin Fully Operational NASA Seeks New Research Proposals	NUCLEAR SPACE Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement