Energy News  
ENERGY TECH
What went wrong on the Deepwater Horizon?

Drilling underway for Canada's deepest oil well
Montreal (AFP) May 11, 2010 - Chevron Canada has begun drilling the country's deepest offshore oil well, as the firm sought to soothe fears over a repeat of the massive oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico. The exploratory well in the North Atlantic, a prospect known as Lona 0-55, is set to establish a new record in Canada with water depth at 2,600 meters (8,530 feet), Chevron said. The Stena Carron drill ship is sinking the well. That's one kilometer (3,280 feet) deeper than the well that was being drilled by the Deepwater Horizon rig before it ruptured, gushing an estimated 210,000 gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico each day.

Eager to avert the kind of PR disaster that has embroiled rival energy giant BP over the US oil slick, Chevron was careful to stress that for its new Canada drilling, "the primary focus of the experienced team managing drilling operations is on ensuring safe and incident-free operations during drilling." The exploratory well, expected to be drilled and evaluated over several months, is located in the largely unexplored Orphan Basin, an area stretching across 100,000 square kilometers (62,140 square miles). It is some 430 kilometers (270 miles) northeast of Newfoundland's capital St. John's. Local officials have also gone at lengths to reassure locals. "We are confident... We're satisfied at this point in time that it is safe and prudent to continue with drilling in the Orphan Basin," Newfoundland and Labrador Natural Resources Minister Kathy Dunderdale told CBC News.

"If there are other steps that we can take that will give us assurance, and give the people of the province assurance about the activity on our offshore, then we are going to do that." Newfoundland's premier, Danny Williams, vowed last week to recruit an independent expert to review the drilling plans. According to CBC, Chevron Canada has two drill ships under contract that could drill relief wells for the Lona 0-55 prospect, which could slow any spill by relieving pressure should the well suffer a blow-out. Chevron Canada Limited has a 50 percent stake in the venture. Other participants include Shell Canada Energy, ExxonMobil Canada Ltd. and Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited.

Troops, choppers build barriers to oncoming Gulf oil
Grand Isle, Louisiana (AFP) May 11, 2010 - US military Black Hawk helicopters dropped sandbags Tuesday in the middle of the channel near a barrier island in Louisiana in a desperate bid to keep the huge, growing oil slick at bay. Creating another obstacle in a bid to protect the area's fragile ecosystem -- home to pelicans, gulls and bounties of sea creatures vital to the local fishing economy-- National Guard troops organized the bags in a bid to plug up channels through which oil could seep into the wetlands. "We have no idea when the oil will reach here, but we hope to have everything finished here by the time it does," a National Guard troop, who declined to be named, told AFP.

Officials have been racing to protect the coast line from the oil gushing from under the sunken Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico at rate of 210,000 gallons a day. On the front lines on Grand Isle, troops working in the baking midday sun, whipped by steady sea winds, were later backed by bulldozers and convoys of trucks to help move tons of the giant sandbags to shore-up defenses. In nearby Port Fourchon, meanwhile BP was putting the finishing touches on to small containment dome -- about the size of a barrel of oil -- that it is hoped can stem the leak that is threatening the Gulf region. Almost three weeks after a BP-leased rig sank spectacularly 50 miles offshore and started hemorrhaging oil, vast swaths of the US coast remain unprotected, with local fisherman joining the effort to place boom along the shoreline in a bid to stop the slick reaching ground.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) May 11, 2010
As US congressional hearings and public investigations begin into the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, here are the main issues being examined by those seeking to aportion blame for the disaster:

CEMENT CASING:

The well being drilled by the Deepwater Horizon rig, Mississippi Canyon Block 252, was in the process of being sealed on the day of the disaster. Exploratory rigs like the Deepwater Horizon only do the initial drilling before production rigs come in to actually extract the oil.

The first step in the sealing process is to lock the casing pipe in place by pouring cement between it and the borehole.

Halliburton, which was contracted for the task, decided to use a cement blend containing nitrogen. The mixture can provide a stronger bond than other cement compounds, but its properties make it trickier to use.

Halliburton official Tim Probert told a Senate committee Tuesday that the cement around the casing had been tested "in accordance with accepted industry practice."

"The results of the positive test were reviewed by the well owner and the decision was made to proceed with the well program."

Cementing is a difficult process, according to F.E. Beck, an associate professor of petroleum at Texas A&M University.

"Cement is perhaps the most difficult barrier to install and control... because cement is installed as a liquid but acts as a barrier as a solid," he told lawmakers.

Halliburton has defended its work on cementing the casing, but faces accusations it mishandled the job.

"Was the well properly cemented? Were there problems with the well casing? Were all appropriate tests run on the cement and casings? These are some of the critical questions," said Steven Newman, chief executive officer at Transocean, which leased the rig to British Petroleum.

CEMENT PLUG:

Once cementing around the casing is complete, ordinary practice would be to "plug" the well with cement. Until that final step, a heavy drilling fluid called "mud" sits over it, preventing flammable gases and materials from shooting up.

A cement plug involves workers pouring liquid cement into the casing pipe which sinks through the "mud" and hardens. The fluid can then be flushed out with sea water.

Halliburton testified Tuesday that the cement was never poured in on this occasion because the process was in fact being carried out in reverse.

"We understand that the drilling contractor then proceeded to displace the riser with seawater prior to the planned placement of the final cement plug," Halliburton executive Tim Probert said.

"Prior to the point in the well construction plan that the Halliburton personnel would have set the final cement plug, the catastrophic incident occurred. As a result, the final cement plug was never set."

It was unclear whether BP had requested the process be done in reverse order. Such a maneuver is unusual but not unprecedented, experts said.

Steven Newman, chief executive of rig owner Transocean, said in his testimony that the blowout had to be caused by "a sudden, catastrophic failure of the cement, the casing or both."

HUMAN ERROR:

By the time the decision was made to flush the pipe, pressure was likely building up in the heavy drilling fluid -- a leak in the cement casing would have made the situation even worse.

A rise in pressure is something rig workers are trained to watch for, as a key warning sign that something is wrong. Increased pressure often precedes a well blow-out.

In this case, the rig workers do not seem to have detected the increasing pressure, which could have been eased by shutting valves. Oblivious, they began pumping sea water into the drilling pipes to clear them. Once the heavier drilling fluid was displaced, the pressure was able to escape, pushing up water and mud first, and then natural gas that was quickly ignited.

Investigators will examine why the crew did not notice the warning sign, and whether eagerness to finish the project quickly played a role. Some reports have suggested the workers though they might receive a bonus for finishing the well early.

BLOW-OUT PREVENTER:

The rig was equipped with a key device that should have been able to seal the well, the so-called blow-out preventer. But the massive instrument, a 450-ton mechanism sitting on top of the wellhead, some 5,000 feet below the sea's surface, failed.

The crew made the first unsuccessful attempts to activate the device before the rig sank. Since then, efforts to activate the preventer using remote-controlled submarines have also failed.

Newman told lawmakers the preventer could not have caused the accident but that once activated it could have prevented some of the environmental damage resulting from the massive oil slick that has leaked from the rig.

BP America Chairman and President Lamar McKay told lawmakers the preventer's failure was still a mystery.

"The systems are intended to be... fail-safe; sadly, and for reasons we do not yet understand, in this case they were not," he said.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


ENERGY TECH
Falklands oil tensions far from over
Stanley, Falkland Islands (UPI) May 11, 2010
Argentina's campaign to draw international attention to its sovereignty claim over the British-ruled Falkland Islands are following a pattern that is unlikely to change any time soon, analysts said. Argentina's pronouncements over Britain's "colonization" of the Falklands increase in intensity each time an upbeat report on the archipelago's oil wealth hits the headlines. The Arge ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement