Energy News  
US Public's View Of Energy Sources, Preferences and Environmental Issues Assessed

Close to two-thirds of respondents oppose the idea of locating a carbon capture and sequestration facility (an underground site that contains carbon dioxide gas extracted from coal) within 25 miles of their residences, and 75% oppose construction of either a coal-burning power plant or nuclear power plant nearby.
by Staff Writers
Menlo Park CA (SPX) Jul 31, 2007
While only two percent of the public indicates that energy is the most important problem facing the U.S. today, the results of a new MIT study based on data from Knowledge Networks offer a compelling snapshot of the public's declining satisfaction with oil for energy, as well as an openness toward alternative energy sources. Study findings highlight viewpoints on coal, dams, natural gas, nuclear power, oil, solar and wind.

From February 23 to March 4, 2007, a random sample of 1,200 online respondents took the same survey that Knowledge Networks administered for MIT in 2002 using a similar sampling methodology. Both studies were conducted on KnowledgePanel(SM) -- the only available probability selected, nationally representative Internet panel.

The general opinion of the U.S. public is:

+ 63% favor somewhat/much stronger environmental regulations
+ 36% indicate global warming is the most important U.S. environmental problem
+ 43% say that some action should be taken on global warming

When asked how harmful they think each power source is, the following percentage of the public indicates that the source is "very harmful:"

+ Coal              29%
+ Dams               3%
+ Natural Gas        5%
+ Nuclear           37%
+ Oil               24%
+ Solar              2%
+ Wind               2%

In the most recent MIT survey, 74% of respondents say they want to decrease use of oil, whereas clear majorities would choose to increase use of solar and wind "a lot" -- a finding in line with 2002. However, when respondents are given purchase price information on solar and wind, their responses reveal diminished support for these energy sources.

Respondents also had reservations about some energy by-products. Close to two-thirds of respondents oppose the idea of locating a carbon capture and sequestration facility (an underground site that contains carbon dioxide gas extracted from coal) within 25 miles of their residences, and 75% oppose construction of either a coal-burning power plant or nuclear power plant nearby.

Perceived environmental harm has the largest effect on support for a given fuel type, especially for coal and nuclear power. However, despite growing public concern over climate change, one finding has not changed since 2002: only a remote connection exists in the public's mind between electricity generation and global warming.

The survey is part of the MIT Energy Initiative. A more extensive working paper is available at the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and the MIT Public Opinion Research Training Lab.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Knowledge Networks
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


China To Step Up Energy Efficiency Drive
Beijing (AFP) Jul 28, 2007
China has announced plans to double spending on improving energy efficiency and slashing pollution, in an effort to combat its dismal environmental record. The government will spend an extra 10 billion yuan (1.33 billion US dollars) on reducing energy use and cutting pollution, according to a statement from the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the state body responsible for economic planning.







  • US Public's View Of Energy Sources, Preferences and Environmental Issues Assessed
  • A Bipartisan Call For Clean Energy In Congressional Package
  • China To Step Up Energy Efficiency Drive
  • Africa Starts To Gear Up For Biofuels

  • Police Seize Three More Suspects In Attack On Nuclear Protesters
  • German Opposition To French-Libyan Nuclear Deal Unabated
  • SE Asia Mulls Tougher Nuclear Rules
  • France And India Hold Nuclear Cooperation Talks

  • Invisible Gases Form Most Organic Haze In Both Urban And Rural Areas
  • BAE Systems Completes Major New Facility For Ionospheric Physics Research
  • NASA Satellite Captures First View Of Night-Shining Clouds
  • Main Component For World Latest Satellite To Measure Greenhouse Gases Delivered

  • East Africa Battles Deforestation With Butterfly Nets
  • Peru Launches Drive To Regrow Lost Forests And Jungles
  • Increase In Creeping Vines Signals Major Shift In Southern US Forests
  • Report Finds Forest Enterprises Stifled By Red Tape, Putting Forests And Incomes At Risk

  • Wild Weather Forces Farmers To Adapt
  • Researcher Studies Proteins That Make Rice Flourish
  • Asian Land Grabs Highlight Class Friction And Bureaucratic Failures
  • Natural Disasters Hit Chinese Grain Output

  • Toyota To Test Electric Plug-In Hybrid Prius Cars
  • Smart Traffic Sign Stops Collisions
  • Toyota Plug-In Hybrid To Hit The Roads
  • Networkcar Selects Siemens Modules For Networkfleet Wireless Vehicle Management System

  • Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft
  • Steering Aircraft Clear Of Choppy Air
  • EAA AirVenture 2007
  • Sensors May Monitor Aircraft For Defects Continuously

  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear
  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement