Trade and the Republican takeover Washington (UPI) Nov 4, 2010 The shift to Republican control in the U.S. House of Representatives may bode well for international trade policy, where the United States is lagging behind its global counterparts. "We are falling behind. Our competitors such as the Europeans and the Japanese are forming free trade agreements, especially with the Asian nations," said Thomas Duesterberg, president and chief executive officer of the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, a public policy and economics research organization in Arlington, Va. "I'm hopeful that the new environment will lead to bi-partisan cooperation." Traditionally, Republicans have pushed for free trade agreements while Democrats have argued that free trade hurts Americans because of cheaper labor abroad. The three major pacts that were created by President George W. Bush in 2007 -- South Korea, Panama and Colombia -- haven't been enacted under the Democrat congressional majority. There is speculation that next year will be an opportunity moment to carry out those pacts. According to the most recent data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, total exports from August were $153.9 billion and imports were $200.2 billion, resulting in a $46.3 billion deficit, up 8.7 percent from the month prior. In July, China's trade surplus hit an 18-month high at $28.7 billion, although it fell to a five-month low at $16.9 billion in September. "Even if one has an unfavorable view in isolation of free trade agreements between rich and poor nations, the Prisoner's Dilemma nature of the game being played would indicate that the U.S. is indeed falling behind," said Alberto Salvo, assistant professor of management and strategy at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management. An anti-trader may prefer that none of the United States, Canada or European Union governments sign a free trade agreement with Colombia, Salvo said. But given this joint commitment isn't possible, and that Canada and the EU are already negotiating agreements with Colombia, the United States should enter into its own agreement as well, or risk losing market share, he said. The U.S.-Colombian Trade Promotion Agreement was approved by Colombia's Congress in 2007. Its constitutional court completed its review in July 2008 and accepted the agreement in conformity with the Columbia's Constitution. The agreement has been awaiting approval in the U.S. Congress before it could be enacted. "I'm hopeful for change. Because it's unknown territory, progress is going to take some cooperation," said Duesterberg, who also raised concern about future tax and carbon emissions policy. "It's been a bad atmosphere in the last couple of years." U.S. President Barack Obama has set a goal of doubling U.S. exports by 2015. Earlier this year, he contacted the president of South Korea to try to finalize details of its free-trade agreements before the Group of 20 summit Nov. 11-12 in South Korea. "We will not create jobs if we shut ourselves out of the global market," Salvo said.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Global Trade News
Brazil to fight US-China 'currency war' at G20 summit: Lula Brasilia (AFP) Nov 3, 2010 Brazil will be looking to fight a "currency war" it sees underway between the United States and China that is threatening its export sector, President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said Wednesday. "I am going to the G20 to fight" this, he said in a joint media conference with his elected successor, Dilma Rousseff, who takes over as Brazilian president in January. Lula said he and Rousseff wo ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |