Energy News  
ENERGY TECH
Pakistan urges India to join Iran pipeline

Russia: New gas conflict with Belarus?
Moscow (UPI) May 21, 2010 - Russian energy giant Gazprom Friday accused Belarus of refusing to pay agreed prices for Russian gas. Gazprom spokesman Sergei Kupriyanov Friday said Belarus state gas transit company Beltransgaz has paid according to a unilaterally determined price, which is much lower than the price agreed in the contract. That's why "the debt for gas delivered to Belarus is increasing month-by-month," Russian news agency Interfax quoted Kupriyanov as saying. In the January-March period, Beltransgaz accumulated debt worth $137 million, Kupriyanov said, adding that after another payment deadline had passed Friday, its current debt increased by $55 million to $192 million. He said the country's debt could increase to $600 million by the end of the year, adding that Gazprom is highly concerned by the payment irregularities.

The remarks came as Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was to meet his Belarusian and Kazakh counterparts for customs talks in St. Petersburg Friday. Earlier this year, a conflict between Russia and Belarus over 2010 oil prices damaged relations between the traditional allies. Russia temporarily stopped the oil flow to Belarus, saying the country wanted to profit from below-market prices by reselling Russian gas tax-free. Most of the oil flowing to Belarus is refined and resold to the West, with the majority reaching Poland and Germany. In a tit-for-tat move, Belarus state power firm Belenergo has threatened to cut electricity to the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad. After some diplomatic wrangling, Belarus and Russia struck a deal. Putin said in March that the Kremlin will subsidize Belarusian oil and gas deliveries by some $4.2 billion in 2010. Gazprom, the state-controlled energy giant, this year acquired 12.5 percent of Beltransgaz for $625 million.

Belarus has in the past years profited from energy prices below free-market levels. Interfax reported that Belarus has to pay an average of $171.50 per 1,000 cubic meters of gas in 2010. Europe pays around $400 for the same amount. Russia has also given the country multibillion-dollar loans to help it survive the economic crisis. Nevertheless, a 2007 row with Russia temporarily halted oil deliveries to Belarus, affecting supplies for Europe. And Russia has clashed with transit countries several times during the past years. Europe in early 2009 battled its worst energy crisis in more than three decades when a dispute between Russia and Ukraine halted gas supplies to Europe during a bitter cold spell, leaving several countries in Central and Eastern Europe without adequate heating supplies. Ukraine is an important gas hub for Europe -- around one-fifth of the continent's gas supplies arrive via Ukrainian pipelines.
by Staff Writers
Tehran (UPI) May 21, 2010
As Iran braces for a new round of U.N. sanctions over its contentious nuclear program, Pakistan has called on longtime rival India to sign on to a planned $7.6 billion natural gas pipeline from the Islamic Republic.

After a two-year lull, New Delhi, a U.S. ally, has signaled it's ready to resume talks on the long-delayed project that Washington bitterly opposes because it will throw Iran an economic lifeline. These could be convened within the next few weeks.

The pipeline, as originally envisioned in 1994 would run from Iran's giant offshore South Pars gas field in the Gulf across Pakistan to India, a distance of 1,764 miles.

The purpose of the controversial project was to provide Iranian gas to help India and Pakistan, both energy-deficient, to alleviate increase severe power shortages in both countries.

Iran and Pakistan signed an agreement in April to build a 560-mile pipeline from South Pars to the Pakistani province of Sindh. Gas sales have also been negotiated between the two countries' state-owned gas concerns.

Islamabad has since offered to guarantee the security of the pipeline if it is extended to India through the troubled province of Baluchistan, which is increasingly becoming a major arena in the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Americans have voiced little, if any, public opposition to the Pakistani project.

But presumably Washington cannot afford to alienate Islamabad at a time when U.S. forces are increasingly reliant on the Pakistani army moving against al-Qaida and the Taliban.

The Iran-Pakistan-India project has been dubbed the "peace pipeline" because it was seen as a symbol of rapprochement between the two Asian neighbors who have been at each other's throats since independence from Britain in 1947.

On Tuesday, Shahid Malik, Pakistan's top diplomat in New Delhi, declared that Islamabad would welcome India joining the much-delayed project, a proposal that the Financial Times reports has considerable backing from the region's business community.

"We have signed an agreement with Iran, and we would welcome India's participation if it wants to," he told a rare Indo-Pakistani business forum in the Indian capital.

Malik's comments were made only days after Indian Foreign Minister S. M. Krishna held talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad about regional stability and bilateral cooperation.

Earlier in May, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart, Yousuf Raza Gilani, had discussed bilateral relations.

However, despite the signs that India is also prepared to defy the United States on the Iran pipeline project, there are still the problems over security for the pipeline and pricing of the gas.

India has boycotted talks on the project since 2008 over concerns about the safe delivery of the Iranian gas and the frequently changing price levels.

New Delhi wants Pakistan to stick to the prices agreed between them in 2007 and to take full responsibility for any breaches in security that blocks supplies reaching India.

If India rejoins the project, Iran would be able to boast it had taken a major step to break out of the economic straitjacket the United States seeks to impose on the Islamic Republic.

But adding India to the equation would also be a massive step toward ending a major source of conflict in the subcontinent that would be of immense geostrategic value for the United States as it battles Islamic forces there.

The Americans have been pushing an alternative energy project: A pipeline to South Asia from gas-rich Turkmenistan in Central Asia via Afghanistan that would bypass Iran.

However, the severe security problems in Afghanistan mean that project has little prospect of getting off the ground any time soon.

The geostrategic consequences of the "peace pipeline" reaching India are many.

There has been talk of extending the pipeline from Iran as far as China, which is constantly in need of energy to fuel its ever-expanding economy.

China has indicated it's ready to go along with new sanctions against Iran.

But its growing energy links with the Islamic Republic, as well as other commerce, point to growing economic ties that the Americans would be powerless to prevent.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


ENERGY TECH
Argentina takes Falklands claim to EU
Madrid (UPI) May 21, 2010
Argentina stressed its sovereignty claim over the Falklands Islands archipelago, increasingly at the center of an intense oil quest, amid sharp rebuffs from Britain's newly installed coalition government and calls for restraint from European partners. President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner launched the claim at the Caribbean-Latin American summit with the European Union despite advice ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement