 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 By Agn�s PEDRERO Geneva (AFP) March 21, 2017
China on Tuesday asked the World Trade Organization to create an expert panel to examine the so-called "surrogate country" approach used by the European Union to calculate anti-dumping measures applied to Chinese exports. When China joined the WTO in 2001, it was written into the terms of the deal that member states could treat it as a non-market economy for 15 years. The deadline passed late last year, but the EU has nevertheless opted to preserve tough rules that protect it from cheap Chinese products flooding its markets. China on Tuesday asked the WTO to establish a panel to rule on its demand that the EU stop using a "surrogate country" system -- judging the price of Chinese goods against a third country's -- to determine whether China is selling its products below market prices. "China is disappointed that it needs to seek action by the DSB (the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body) in order for the European Union to remedy the obvious and egregious WTO-inconsistency of its measures," China's representative to the global trade body said Tuesday. Beijing has said previously that the refusal to grant China market economy status is an example of "covert protectionism" and "double standard" by the West. The request to the WTO came after China last December filed initial disputes against the EU and the United States over the issue, which are being handled separately in the WTO system. After the parties failed to reach an agreement during WTO-led consultations, the door was left open for China to ask the WTO to create a panel of experts to review the case. - 'Manifestly premature' - Not surprisingly, the EU opposed the request. In a statement to the DSB Tuesday, the EU representative pointed out that the bloc was currently debating whether or not to change its categorisation of China, and voiced regret over Beijing's decision to push ahead and demand a panel. "We think it is inappropriate use of the already strained resources of the WTO dispute settlement system," the representative said. "China's request is ... manifestly premature and incapable as a matter of principle of being fruitful," the statement said. The EU "can only conclude that China's objective is, in fact, to attempt to interfere in the internal legislative process of the European Union," it continued, adding: "This should be a matter of grave concern to all members." AEGIS Europe, an alliance of nearly 30 European manufacturing associations, also slammed Tuesday's move, urging the EU to stand up to China's "divide and conquer" strategy. "China's trade strategy is simply astounding, it is like Lance Armstrong suing the Tour de France to reinstate his medals, even though he is a proven doping cheat," AEGIS spokesman Milan Nitzschke said in a statement. The EU's opposition blocks the panel creation for now, but under WTO rules, if China makes a second request, it will automatically go through. WTO's panels of independent trade and legal experts usually take several months to render their decisions. They can authorise retaliatory trade measures if they rule in favour of a plaintiff. The WTO polices global trade accords in an effort to ensure a level playing field for its 164 member economies.
Unforeseen impacts of the fair trade movementNewark DE (SPX) Mar 21, 2017 Fair trade certified coffee is the kind of phrase that sounds good on a Whole Foods shelf, the type of marketing that merges first world affluence with third world resource. For the average consumer, it implies fairness in labor and wealth, the idea that small producers profit directly from the products and goods they produce. The reality is far more complex, says Lindsay Naylor, assistant ... read more Related Links Global Trade News
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
